Legal Opinion

Morffew v. S.F. & San Rafael R.R.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1895No. 15243PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marin County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Britt, C.

Matthew Crooks died in the month of February, 1879, being then the owner of property amounting to seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars, or thereabouts, in value, and consisting mainly of real estate in Marin and other counties of this state. He had at that time about two thousand five hundred acres in the county named, including two certain parcels of salt marsh and tide lands containing together fifteen and twenty-one one-hundredths acres, which marsh and tide land was unproductive and unimproved. Decedent left *590a widow, Susan Crooks, who yet survives, and the whole estate was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Crane v. Lessee of MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Blagge v. MilesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1841
  4. Newton v. . BronsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  5. Stevenson v. . LesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. DuffillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Luscomb v. FintzelbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Keating v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. In Re Estate of SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API