Crouse v. Peterson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
Plaintiff's testator resided in Minnesota up to the time of his death, and in that state made his will January 31, 1889. He died February 3, 1899. The will was duly probated in Minnesota and afterward was proven, as provided by law in reference to foreign wills, in the superior court of San Diego county, and admitted to probate, and letters of administration with the will annexed were issued to plaintiff, who in due time qualified. Thereafter plaintiff, as such adminstrator, not having obtained an order of sale, entered into a contract with defendant, whereby he agreed to sell, and defendant.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mott v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Shields v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
- Kidwell v. BrummagimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Barnes v. HenshawNew York Supreme Court · 1839
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCarty v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Barnes v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Linton v. LintonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
- Hunter v. ClawsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Lindstrom v. HaglundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.