Legal Opinion
Gastelum v. Remax International, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 2016No. B263213PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.—
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendants, Remax International, Inc., and Jose Garcia-Yanez, appeal from an order lifting a litigation stay. Plaintiff, Amparo Gastelum, filed a complaint against defendants regarding her employment. Defendants moved to compel arbitration. The trial court granted the motion to compel arbitration of Remax International, Inc., and stayed the litigation in the judicial forum pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.4. Mr. Garcia-Yanez’s motion to compel arbitration was denied.
Plaintiff initiated the arbitration proceeding. Plaintiff requested Remax…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Marsh v. Mountain Zephyr, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Berman v. Renart Sportswear Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Henry v. Alcove Investment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Laymon v. J. Rockcliff, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Arshonsky v. Kim, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Fregoso v. Eat Club CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Hang v. RG Legacy ICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- J.H. Boyd Enterprises, Inc. v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.