Legal Opinion

People v. Sanders

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1896No. Crim. No. 95PublishedCited by 62 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. J. R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

W. A. Sanders was indicted for forging the name of William Wootton in a draft upon ICutner-Gnldstein Co. for the sum of fourteen hundred dollars, payable to the order of said Sanders, and for uttering and passing the said draft, knowing the same to be false and forged. From the judgment of conviction, and from the order denying him a new trial, he prosecutes these appeals.

The story, as told by the evidence in this case, is extraordinary and, in some respects, without parallel. The defendant.is a man nearly sixty years of age, who has resided in this state for more than half of his lifetime.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FairlambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. People v. McGungillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. People v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. CoefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Hirshfeld v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API