Legal Opinion

Romero v. Truchas Mutual Domestic Water Consumer & Mutual Sewage Works Ass'n

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1995No. 15970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

1. Two issues are presented for our review in this negligence action: (1) whether Plaintiff adduced sufficient evidence to merit a jury trial and instruction on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur; and (2) whether Plaintiff properly preserved the issue of res ipsa loquitur for appellate review when the trial court entered summary judgment for Defendant. We reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, and we remand for a new trial allowing the jury to consider evidence relating to negligence according to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. It is unnecessary to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Pharmaseal Laboratories, Inc. v. GoffeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Hepp v. Quickel Auto & Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spectron Development Laboratory v. American Hollow Boring Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Drake v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Berganza v. Rhode Island Economic Dev., PcSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  4. Lancaster v. Goodman Real EstateDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
  5. Thomson v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API