Legal Opinion

Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 8, 1958No. 46704PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLINGSWORTH, Chief Justice.

Adam Hat Stores, Inc., hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, instituted this action in the Circuit Court of Jackson County to recover from Kansas City, hereinafter frequently referred to as “the city”, the sum of $3,812.49 for damage by water to certain of its merchandise resulting from a break in the city’s water main located in the public street in front of plaintiff’s store in which the merchandise was kept. The cause was submitted to a jury under the res ipsa loquitur doctrine. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the city, but the trial court sustained…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Harke v. HaaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Esberg Cigar Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. State Ex Rel. Rice v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. Layton v. PalmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Graeff Ex Rel. Graeff v. Baptist Temple of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Jennings Buick, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. BolesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Junior College District of St. Louis v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API