Legal Opinion

Hepp v. Quickel Auto & Supply Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1933No. 3674PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

After the presentation of able oral arguments and helpful briefs upon a rehearing granted in this case, we remain convinced that the result reached in the original opinion is sound. We have concluded, however, to withdraw the opinion heretofore filed and to substitute the present opinion therefor.

The plaintiff, Margaret Hepp, who is appellant in this court, as administrator of the estate of her deceased husband, Edgar Hepp, sought damages from the defendant, a New Mexico corporation, engaged in the garage business at Albuquerque, before the district court of Torrance county,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Plumb v. . Richmond Light R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Burghardt v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Pope v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. North Memphis Sav. Bank v. Union Bridge & Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Heffter v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Mellon v. KellyMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Renfro v. JD Coggins CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Buchanan v. DowningNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Mares v. New Mexico Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Tuso v. MarkeyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API