Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 20, 1996No. 15366PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The state department of transportation (state) appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion to dismiss the complaint of the third party plaintiffs, Peabody, N.E., Inc., Peabody International Corporation and the Federal Insurance Company1 (collectively, Peabody), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The state claims that the trial court improperly concluded that Peabody, a general contractor that had contracted with the state to reconstruct Route 8 and the Commodore Hull Bridge between the towns of Shelton and Derby, could maintain this third party action against the state, based on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Interstate Contracting Corp. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- In re Baby Z.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Babcock v. Bridgeport HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.