Legal Opinion

Antinerella v. Rioux

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 31, 1994No. 14734PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.

The plaintiff, deputy sheriff Joseph Antinerella,1 an at-will employee, sued the defendant, Alfred J. Rioux, as an individual and in his capacity as high sheriff of Hartford county, for wrongfully terminating the plaintiff’s employment for the alleged purposes of misappropriating the plaintiff’s business of serving process and furthering the defendant’s own illegal fee splitting enterprise. The principal issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed the suit on the grounds that the doctrine of sovereign immunity and the immunity provisions of General Statutes § 4-165 shielded…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  5. Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API