Legal Opinion

Hamerly v. City of Lennox Bd. of Adj.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSabers, Justice

[¶ 1.] After concluding that city illegally granted building permit, circuit court ordered city to remove newly constructed building located on private property. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

[¶2.] The City of Lennox, South Dakota enacted an ordinance establishing new zoning regulations effective August 28, 1996. John Foltz operated a small engine repair business in an area zoned residential under the new ordinance. In October of 1996, fire destroyed one of the three buildings from which he conducted his business. The other two buildings were damaged by the fire.

[¶3.] On November…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peters v. Spearfish ETJ Planning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Save Centennial Valley Ass'n, Inc. v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Breckweg v. KnochenmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Brown County v. MeidingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Olson v. City of DeadwoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Even v. City of ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Juttelstad v. JuttelstadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cole v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF HURONSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Zoss v. Dakota Truck UnderwritersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hentz v. City of Spearfish, Department of Public Works, Office of Planning & ZoningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API