Legal Opinion
Olson v. City of Deadwood
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1992No. 17602PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WUEST, Justice.
Appellants, Arthur and Sophie Olson (the Olsons) d/b/a Four Aces, appeal two orders entered by the circuit court dismissing their Petition for Writ of Certiorari brought pursuant to SDCL 11-4-25 through SDCL 11-4-29. The Olsons’ initially appealed to the circuit court from a decision of the Deadwood City Planning and Zoning Commission (the Commission), sitting in its capacity as the Deadwood Board of Adjustment (the Board or Board of Adjustment) which, in separate actions, voted unanimously to deny the Olsons’ proposed commercial use of the property in question. We affirm the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- C. R. Investments, Inc. v. Village of ShoreviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Even v. City of ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Jensen v. TURNER COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Schrank v. Pennington County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Hamerly v. City of Lennox Bd. of Adj.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Engesser v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.