Legal Opinion

Hentz v. City of Spearfish, Department of Public Works, Office of Planning & Zoning

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Donna Hentz (Hentz) petitioned the trial court for a writ of mandamus commanding the City of Spearfish (City) to comply with its zoning ordinances. The court issued the writ of mandamus, but did not order the removal of the addition. Hentz appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

[If 2.] The dispute between City and Hentz arises out of an unlawfully issued budding permit. 1 Hentz resides next door to Mary Kay Viles and Joe DeSiena (Viles) in City. Viles applied to City for a building permit that would allow her to construct a multi-story addition onto her home. City initially denied…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. AlmondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Matter of Estate of O'KeefeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Baltodano v. North Central Health Services, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Baker v. AtkinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Eagle Ridge Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Lord v. Hy-Vee Food StoresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. MacKaben v. MacKabenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Grynberg Exploration Corp. v. PuckettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API