Legal Opinion
Peters v. Spearfish ETJ Planning Commission
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Landmark Realty and Development Company (Landmark) and Spring Creek Ranch appeal the trial court’s construction of a zoning ordinance and its decision that the Spearfish ETJ Planning Commission (Commission), the Spearfish City Council (City) and the Lawrence County Board of Commissioners (County) exceeded their authority and jurisdiction by approving a proposed planned unit development near Spearfish, South Dakota. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Landmark owns a 240-acre tract of land in Lawrence County, South Dakota. The land is located within the extraterritorial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- At & T Information Systems v. South Dakota State Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re the Appeal of the Sales Tax Refund Applications of Black Hills Power & Light Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Cordell v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Nilson v. Clay CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Even v. City of ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Juttelstad v. JuttelstadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Esling v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Hamerly v. City of Lennox Bd. of Adj.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Planned Parenthood Minnesota v. Mike RoundsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.