Legal Opinion

Cole v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF HURON

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1999No. 20583PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Landowner applied for and received a writ of certiorari contesting the grant of a variance by the Board of Adjustment for the City of Huron. The trial court found the Board’s grant of a variance was not done in compliance with the City’s zoning ordinances and reversed. We reverse and remand to the trial court with instructions to reconsider this case applying the appropriate standard of review.

PACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] On January 12,1998, Casey’s General Stores, Inc., Anthony Stahl and Floyd H. Peterson (Casey’s) applied to the Board of Adjustment for the City of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cordell v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Robbins v. BuntrockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Nilson v. Clay CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Peters v. Spearfish ETJ Planning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hines v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Cole v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF CITY OF HURONSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Approval of Request for Amendment to Frawley Planned Unit DevelopmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Holborn v. Deuel Cnty. Bd. of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. In Re the Support Obligation of Do RegoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API