Legal Opinion
Hatch v. Security-First National Bank
California Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1942No. L. A. 17529; L. A. 17530; L. A. 17531; L. A. 17532PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT. —
Plaintiffs brought these actions, which have been consolidated for the purposes of this appeal, in order to quiet title to certain real and personal property. The actions were begun by Stella Schmidt Hatch, Ruben S. Schmidt and Harriet Schmidt Sparks, the children of Huida Franciska Schmidt who died testate in the city of Los Angeles on December 14,1930. At the time of her death, Huida Franciska Schmidt was indebted to the Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles in the sum of $52,000. This debt was evidenced by her unsecured note and that of her son, Ruben S. Schmidt.
Upon the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Herbert Kraft Co. v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. LaufferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Bennett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Resolution Trust Corporation, as Conservator for Great American First Savings Bank v. Bayside DevelopersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.