Sands v. Granite Mutual Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cercone, J.,
This appeal arises from a judgment for the plaintiff-insured, Mr. Sands, in the amount of $10,000 after a jury trial below.
The facts of the case, though tantalizingly incomplete in the record, may be stated as follows, giving the plaintiff the benefit of all the favorable inferences and interpretations to which he, as the verdict winner, is entitled: In April of 1966, Mr. Sands came to Universal Insurance Agency in order to purchase insurance for his 1964 Chevrolet. At that time he told Universal’s *73employee that he -wanted “to be fully insured under 10-20 and 5 — fully…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Johnson v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Pattani v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Katz v. American Motorist InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Rossi v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Sands v. Pa. Ins. Guaranty Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Boyle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Jeffrey v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.