Legal Opinion

Katz v. American Motorist Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1966No. Civ. 28803PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.

The sole question presented here is whether the term “uninsured motor vehicle” as used in Insurance Code section 11580.2 includes a vehicle which was insured by a company which became insolvent after the vehicle’s operator had become liable for damages for bodily injury.

In this action for declaratory relief plaintiff is the insured and defendant her insurer under a policy of automobile insurance which includes protection against uninsured motorists. The ease was submitted to the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts, resulting in a judgment for defendant, from which plaintiff is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Inter-Insurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BrowerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  5. North River Insurance v. GibsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API