Legal Opinion

Lagassey v. State

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 9, 2007No. SC 17603PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court properly concluded that the tolling provision of General Statutes § 4-160 (d) 1 operates only to suspend the running of the two year limitations period under the wrongful death statute, General Statutes § 52-555, 2 and does not cause that limitations period to begin running anew after the claims commissioner has granted a claimant permission to sue the state. The plaintiff, Louisette G. Lagassey, individually and as executrix of the estate of her decedent husband, 3 Wilfred J. Lagassey, brought this wrongful death action 4 against the…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lagassey v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Mattera v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Cashman v. Town of TollandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Lagassey v. StateConnecticut Superior Court · 2005

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kelly v. University of Connecticut Health CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Terra Firma, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. ParadisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Hotshoe Enterprises, LLC v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. VIP OF BERLIN, LLC v. Town of BerlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API