Legal Opinion

Cashman v. Town of Tolland

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 18, 2005No. SC 17284PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court, Quinn, J., properly interpreted the language of General Statutes § 31-76b (2) in ruling that employees called into work outside of their normal working hours by the defendant, the town of Tolland (town), were entitled to be paid from the time they actually reported for work, and not from the time when they were first contacted to report for work.1 The plaintiff, Shaun B. Cashman, the commissioner of labor (commissioner), brought an action pursuant to General *14Statutes §§ 31-682 and 31-723 against the town to collect unpaid wages on…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Heather L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Cashman v. Town of TollandConnecticut Superior Court · 2004

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lagassey v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Terra Firma, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. ParadisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. VIP OF BERLIN, LLC v. Town of BerlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Corcoran v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API