Cashman v. Town of Tolland
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court, Quinn, J., properly interpreted the language of General Statutes § 31-76b (2) in ruling that employees called into work outside of their normal working hours by the defendant, the town of Tolland (town), were entitled to be paid from the time they actually reported for work, and not from the time when they were first contacted to report for work.1 The plaintiff, Shaun B. Cashman, the commissioner of labor (commissioner), brought an action pursuant to General *14Statutes §§ 31-682 and 31-723 against the town to collect unpaid wages on…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Heather L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Cashman v. Town of TollandConnecticut Superior Court · 2004
4Cited by5 opinions
- Lagassey v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Terra Firma, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Universal Underwriters Insurance v. ParadisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- VIP OF BERLIN, LLC v. Town of BerlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Corcoran v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007