Legal Opinion
Hotshoe Enterprises, LLC v. City of Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 1, 2008No. SC 17885PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant, the city of Hartford, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the tax appeal, brought pursuant to General Statutes *834§ 12-119,2 by the plaintiffs, fourteen owners of condominium hangar units at Brainard Airport.3 The defendant contends that the trial court improperly concluded that the condominium hangar units are exempt, pursuant to General Statutes § 12-64 (c),4 from municipal property taxes. Hotshoe Enterprises, LLC v. Hartford, 50 Conn. Sup. 476, 486, 939 A.2d 641 (2006). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*835The record reveals the following…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Lagassey v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Mattera v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Hotshoe Enterprises, LLC v. City of HartfordConnecticut Superior Court · 2006
- Message Center Management, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
4Cited by4 opinions
- Tirado v. City of TorringtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Saracino v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Lopes v. FarmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Stratford v. JacobelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015