Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Sanders & Thomas, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1974No. Appeal, No. 723 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The parties to this appeal are the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (hereinafter referred to as *147PTC), appellant, and Sanders & Thomas, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as S&T), appellee. The thing appealed from is an award to S&T by arbitrators appointed and acting pursuant to the Act of April 25, 1927, P. L. 381, 5 P.S. §161 et seq.

The parties entered into a written agreement, prepared by PTC and dated June 30, 1969, for the performance by S&T of engineering and design services for new and revised toll collection facilities at nine interchanges at the eastern portion of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Emmaus Municipal Authority v. EltzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Foley Bros., Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Sanders & Thomas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth, General State Authority v. LoffredoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Litton RCS, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. In Re Curtis Center Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Litton RCS, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API