Legal Opinion

Haley v. Bay Cities Transit Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1947No. Civ. 15898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Plaintiff Mrs. Haley sought damages for personal injuries sustained by her when she, a pedestrian, was struck by a motorbus owned and operated by the defendant. Plaintiff Mr. Haley, her husband, sought consequential damages. The jury rendered two verdicts—one for the wife and one for the husband, and judgments were entered thereon. Defendant made a motion for a new trial on the ground, among others, that the evidence was insufficient to justify “the verdict and judgment.” The court granted the motion upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support “the verdict and the judgment.”

P…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hames v. RustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Imperial-Yuma Production Credit Assn. v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Bayley v. SouzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rau v. Redwood City Woman's ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API