Legal Opinion
Mgic Indemnity Corporation v. Lawrence I. Weisman, Thomas P. Dunn, L.N. Nevels, Jr., and Henry K.F. Kersting
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 5, 1986No. 85-1827, 85-2328 and 85-2792PublishedCited by 450 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, Circuit Judge.
MGIC Indemnity Corporation (MGIC), a New York corporation, appeals the dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted of its suit against Lawrence I. Weisman, a citizen and resident of Maryland, and against Thomas P. Dunn, L.N. Nevels, Jr., and Henry K.F. Kersting, citizens and residents of Hawaii. MGIC also appeals the award of attorneys’ fees against it. We affirm the dismissal and the award of fees. We remand for a new hearing on the fees.
The Timeliness of MGIC’s Appeal. The clerk of the district court originally entered judgment dismissing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Metropolitan Engravers, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Okada v. MGIC Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by450 opinions
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Bryant v. Avado Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Greg and Mary Henson v. Csc Credit Services, Trans Union Corporation, and Cosco Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Jehan Zeb Mir, M.D. v. Little Company of Mary HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
445 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.