Legal Opinion

Bell v. Irace

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1993No. 555PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, President Judge:

Appellants, Sharen and Wilbert Bell, appeal from the trial court’s order sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer filed by Appellees, John Irace and Elizabeth Reis. The Bells sued Irace and Reis for negligence, but pursuant to the preliminary objections, the trial court dismissed the suit based on Appellants’ failure to allege sufficient facts in their complaint to establish proximate causation between Appellants’ injuries and the alleged negligence of the Appellees. We affirm the trial court’s order dismissing Appellants’ complaint.

Appellants…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Mazzagatti v. Everingham by EveringhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Lowrey v. HorvathSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. Corbin v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Zanine v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Army of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Wiernik v. PHH U.S. Mortgage Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Straw, J. v. Fair, K. v. Pittsburgh LubesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Yurecka v. ZappalaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. Amarhanov v. FasselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API