Legal Opinion

Andrew v. Shimerda

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 3, 1934No. 42249PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

The record in this case is extremely meager, and some material facts must be inferred. The action is upon a promissory note for $4,900, executed September 30, 1931, by appellant to the Oxford Junction Savings Bank of Oxford Junction, Iowa. A credit of $200, dated October 1, 1931, is indorsed on the note. The defenses pleaded are that the note was conditionally delivered to the bank; that it was procured through fraudulent representations of the cashier; that it is an accommodation note; and that same was executed without consideration.

Appellant was a stockholder and member of the board of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hills Savings Bank v. HirtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Citizens Bank v. Bank of WaddyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Markville State Bank v. SteinbringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Crum v. EmmettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Bates v. Clarion Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Central Republic Trust Co. v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API