Legal Opinion

Crum v. Emmett

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 5, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note for $2,000, dated February 10, 1912, due in two years, and drawing interest at the rate of 8 per cent. Plaintiff and appellee is the receiver of the Conway Savings Bank, the payee named in the note. Most of the propositions relied upon by appellant for reversal are based upon exceptions to the instructions given, and the refusal of the court to give other instructions to the jury.- A somewhat extended statement of the issues is necessary to a clear understanding of the questions presented for review.

The execution of the note is admitted. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lyons v. BenneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Skagit State Bank v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. First National Bank v. FeltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Arthur v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  5. Woodbury v. GlickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Camerer v. California Savings & Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Riches v. Hadlock, Bank Com'r.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. OehlertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. Smouse v. Waterloo Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Andrew v. ShimerdaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API