State ex rel. Watkins v. Fiorenzo
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
R.C. 2733.14 provides that when a respondent “in an action in quo warranto is found guilty of usurping, intruding into, or unlawfully holding or exercising an office, * * * judgment shall be rendered that he be ousted and excluded therefrom, and that the relator recover his costs.” “A public official * * * who is convicted of or pleads guilty to, theft in office [R.C. 2921.41(A) ] is *260forever disqualified from holding any public office, employment, or position of trust in this state.” R.C. 2921.41(C)(1).
A public official who is convicted of theft in office is statutorily disqualified from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. PoindexterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CashOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Forfeiture of One 1986 Buick Somerset AutomobileOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. Gains v. RossiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Gains v. RossiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Huron County Prosecutor v. WesterholdOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. DoyleOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.