Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Watkins v. Fiorenzo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1994No. 94-2446PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 2733.14 provides that when a respondent “in an action in quo warranto is found guilty of usurping, intruding into, or unlawfully holding or exercising an office, * * * judgment shall be rendered that he be ousted and excluded therefrom, and that the relator recover his costs.” “A public official * * * who is convicted of or pleads guilty to, theft in office [R.C. 2921.41(A) ] is *260forever disqualified from holding any public office, employment, or position of trust in this state.” R.C. 2921.41(C)(1).

A public official who is convicted of theft in office is statutorily disqualified from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PoindexterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. CashOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re Forfeiture of One 1986 Buick Somerset AutomobileOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State ex rel. Gains v. RossiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Gains v. RossiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Huron County Prosecutor v. WesterholdOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. DoyleOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API