Legal Opinion

State v. Henderson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1979No. 78-1158PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebkezze, C. J.

Appellant has raised a sole proposition of law that reads as follows; “When a trial judge accepts a plea of guilty of an accused, this opérales as a conviction despite the fact that the judge delays sentencing.” More specifically, the issue to be resolved on this appeal concerns the intent of the General Assembly in enacting the phrase “previously been convicted of a theft offense” as it is used in R. C. 2913.02(B).

The provisions of that statute indicate the following:

“(A) No person, with purpose to deprive the owner of property or services, shall knowingly obtain or exert control over either:

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. GordonOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. United States v. Allen, John BrettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. State v. O'DELLIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. GoffOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. PoindexterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. FryOhio Supreme Court · 2010

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API