Legal Opinion

State v. Cash

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1988No. 87-1153PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue before this court is whether a prior conviction may be used for impeachment purposes, pursuant to Evid. R. 609(A), even though sentence has not been pronounced on that conviction. We hold that such a conviction may be used for impeachment purposes.

Evid. R. 609(A) states:

*118“For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if elicited from him or established by public record during cross-examination but only if the crime (1) was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year under the law under which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. State v. ReyesArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. ReyesArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. BowenOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. United States v. Larry Dean TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. FearsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. FearsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Watkins v. FiorenzoOhio Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API