Legal Opinion
State v. Cash
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1988No. 87-1153PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The issue before this court is whether a prior conviction may be used for impeachment purposes, pursuant to Evid. R. 609(A), even though sentence has not been pronounced on that conviction. We hold that such a conviction may be used for impeachment purposes.
Evid. R. 609(A) states:
*118“For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if elicited from him or established by public record during cross-examination but only if the crime (1) was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year under the law under which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State v. ReyesArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. ReyesArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. BowenOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- United States v. Larry Dean TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. FearsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. FearsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Watkins v. FiorenzoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.