Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Huron County Prosecutor v. Westerhold

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1995No. 94-2006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

As a preliminary matter, we note that Westerhold has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and a motion to strike appellant’s brief. Westerhold claims that under the Supreme Court Rules of Practice, appellant’s brief was not timely filed. Westerhold cites former S.Ct.Prac.R. V(l), which required appellants in all civil cases to file briefs “within ten days of the date the copies of the record [were] filed with the Court.” However, this appeal is governed by the new Supreme Court Rules of Practice, which became effective June 1, 1994. See Preface to S.Ct.Prac.R. Under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI(1)(A), an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. The People of N.C. Ex Rel . Norfleet v. . Staton, Jr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  3. State ex rel. Carter v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Battin v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Cablevision of the Midwest, Inc. v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. E. Cleveland Fire Fighters' Assn., Local 500, IAFF v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Varnau v. WenningerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State Ex Rel. Calvaruso v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Huron Cty. Prosecutor v. WesterholdOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. East Cleveland Fire Fighters' Ass'n, Local 500 v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API