Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gains v. Rossi

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1999No. 99-597PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Per curiam

Gains asserts that the court of appeals erred in denying the writ of quo toarranto. In order to be entitled to the requested writ of quo warranto, Gains had to establish that Rossi should be ousted from his office of village councilman because he had usurped, intruded into, or unlawfully held or exercised the office. R.C. 2733.01(A) and 2733.14; State ex rel. Watkins v. Fiorenzo (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 259, 643 N.E.2d 521.

The version of R.C. 2961.01 in effect when Rossi took office provided:

“A person convicted of a felony under the laws o/this or any other state or the United States, unless his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cater v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Barker v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Watkins v. FiorenzoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. BissantzOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Schwab v. GallasDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Whitman v. Hamilton County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Whitman v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. HilbertOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Clay v. Cuyahoga Cty. Med. Examiner's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State ex rel. Citizens for Open, Responsive & Accountable Government v. RegisterOhio Supreme Court · 2007

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API