Legal Opinion

Winfield v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 11, 1949PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STACY, C.J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

2Concurring in part, dissenting in partBarnhill, J.

This was an action to recover damages for personal injury sustained as result of collision between an automobile plaintiff was driving and a truck of defendant Colonial Stores, Inc., being driven by defendant Smith. It was alleged that plaintiff's injury was caused by the negligence of defendant Smith who was at the time acting in the scope of his employment by the corporate defendant.

The collision occurred about 6:10 a.m., 18 June, 1947, on State Highway 70, six miles west of Smithfield. Plaintiff was driving a Chevrolet…

3Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by32 opinions

  1. Carson v. DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Rice v. City of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Rodgers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Chambers Ex Rel. Chambers v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Bondurant v. MastinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API