Nash v. . Royster
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The exception addressed to the refusal of the colirt to grant the defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made first at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, and renewed at the close of all the evidence, needs no particular elaboration. The first exception has been waived, under the express provisions of the statute. C. S., 561. The defendant had the right to rely on the weakness of the plaintiff’s evidence when she rested her case; but, having elected to offer testimony in his own behalf, he did so cum onere, and only the exception noted at the close of all the evidence may now be…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Brewer v. RingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Dashiell v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Long v. MorrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Dubois v. . DeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Iodice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Wall v. StoutSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.