Legal Opinion

Lavender v. Kurn

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 25, 1946No. 550PublishedCited by 952 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

The Federal Employers’ Liability Act permits recovery for personal injuries to an employee of a railroad engaged in interstate commerce if such injuries result “in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to its negligence, in its cars, engines, appliances, machinery, track, roadbed, works, boats, wharves,' or other equipment.” 45 U. S. C. § 51.

Petitioner, the administrator of the estate of L. E; Haney, brought this suit under the Act against the respondent trustees of the St. Louis-San…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945

3Cited by952 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Felix Norbert Siewe v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

947 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API