Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Altizer

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1943No. 7080PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondents, directing compliance with and specific performance of an escrow agreement.

Numerous errors are assigned but they reduce themselves to two classes: First, that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment; and secondly, that the court erred in failing to make findings on certain issues tendered by the cross-complaint.

It appears that respondents held a lease on the premises here involved coupled with an option to purchase. Before the expiration of the lease, and about the month of August, 1941, they entered into oral negotiations…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gould v. HillIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Stewart v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Reid v. KeatorIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Whitney v. DeweyIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Craddock v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Watkins v. WatkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Loosli v. HesemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Williams v. Idaho Potato Starch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Reynolds Irr. Dist. v. SproatIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Andrus v. IrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API