Legal Opinion

Andrus v. Irick

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1964No. 9219PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Petition for rehearing having been granted, and the cause reheard, the previous opinion is withdrawn, and this opinion issued in lieu thereof.

We shall dispose of the issues presented, in this order: first by defendants’ cross-appeal; and second by plaintiffs’ appeal.

DEFENDANTS’ CROSS APPEAL

Plaintiffs, appellants and cross-respondents herein (hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs), instituted this action to rescind a certain real estate contract wherein they were the purchasers and the defendants (respondents and cross-appellants), were the vendors. By their complaint the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Angleton v. AngletonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Walker v. NunnenkampIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Geist v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Checketts v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Jones v. WatsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Stewart v. Hood CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Johnston v. PascoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Shrives v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API