Legal Opinion

In Re Medical X-Ray Film Antitrust Litigation

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 27, 1996No. CV-93-5904PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIFTON,'Chief Judge.

In these consolidated antitrust actions, plaintiffs allege that defendants Eastman Kodak Co., E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Miles, Inc., and Fuji Medical Systems, U.S.A., Inc. have fixed the prices of medical x-ray and imaging films since 1988, in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act (“the Sherman Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1. Defendants have filed a renewed motion to dismiss the amended complaint, pursuant to Rules 8, 9, and 12 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is converted into one for summary judgment and, as such, is…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Romero v. Philip Morris Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Jung v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  3. In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  4. Hall v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2003
  5. In Re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API