Legal Opinion
In Re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 15, 2010No. Civil Action 3:03md1542 (SRU), 3:05md1642 (SRU)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO STRIKE and FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.
This multidistrict litigation arises out of allegations that the defendants conspired to fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the price of ethylene propylene diene monomer (“EPDM”) synthetic rubber at artificially high, noncompetitive levels in violation of federal antitrust law. The remaining defendants, DSM Copolymer, Inc. (“DCI”) and DSM Elastomers Europe B.Y. (“DEE”) (collectively, the “DSM defendants”), 1 move for summary judgment on all claims of the class plaintiffs in the In re Ethylene Propylene…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Strauss v. Crédit Lyonnais, S.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Carney v. LopezDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Fleischman v. Albany Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.