Legal Opinion
In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 14, 2013No. Civil Action No. RDB-10-0318PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge.
This class action concerns an alleged price-fixing conspiracy in the market for titanium dioxide.1 The Plaintiff class representatives Haley Paint Company, Isaac Industries, Inc., and East Coast Colorants, LLC, doing business as Breen Color Concentrates, and the class of titanium dioxide purchasers whom they represent (together, “Plaintiffs”) claim that Defendants Kronos Worldwide Inc. (“Kronos”), and Cristal USA Inc., formerly known as Millennium Inorganic Chemicals, Inc. (“Millennium”), together with E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Domestic Drywall Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- In re Titanium Dioxide Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- In re: Domestic Drywall Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Kleen Products LLC v. International PaperDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Valspar Corp. v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.