Legal Opinion
LOVO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2005No. ID 3512PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 746
(BIA 2005) Interim Decision #3512 In re Jose Mauricio LOVO-Lara, Beneficiary of a visa petition filed by Gia Teresa LOVO-Ciccone, Petitioner File A95 076 067 - Nebraska Service Center Decided May 18, 2005 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) The Defense of Marriage Act,
Pub. L. No. 104-199, 110
Stat. 2419 (1996), does not preclude, for purposes of Federal law, recognition of a marriage involving a postoperative transsexual, where the marriage is considered by the State in which it was performed as one between…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Revelis v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Radtke v. Miscellaneous Drivers & Helpers Union Local 638 Health, Welfare, Eye & Dental FundDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- United States v. BhimaniDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- ZELENIAKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2013