Legal Opinion

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Phinpathya

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 10, 1984No. 82-91PublishedCited by 363 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

In § 244(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (Act), 66 Stat. 214, as amended, 8 U. S. C. § 1254(a)(1), Congress provided that the Attorney General in his discretion may suspend deportation and adjust the status of an otherwise deportable alien who (1) “has been physically present in the United States for a continuous period of not less than seven years”; (2) “is a person of good moral character”; and (3) is “a person whose deportation would, in the opinion of the Attorney General, result in extreme hardship to the alien or to his spouse, parent, or child . . . In this case we must…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by363 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Tengiz Sevoian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

358 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API