Legal Opinion

McMullin v. Beran

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 20, 2000No. 611, 1999PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice.

The plaintiff-appellant, Mary E. McMul-lin, a purported shareholder of ARCO Chemical Company (“Chemical”), filed this putative class action against Chemical, its directors (the “Individual Defendants” or the “Chemical Directors”), Atlantic Rich-field Company (“ARCO”), Lyondell Petrochemical Company (“Lyondell”), and Lyondell’s subsidiary, Lyondell Acquisition Corporation. ARCO owned 80% of Chemical’s common stock. The Amended Complaint alleged that the Individual Defendants and ARCO, aided and abetted by Lyondell, breached their fiduciary duties in connection with Lyondell’s…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  4. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  5. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. VLIW TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  3. In Re General Motors (Hughes) Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. Orman v. CullmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2002

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API