Legal Opinion

United States v. Williamson

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 19, 1986No. ACM 25049PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MICHALSKI, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted in a bench trial of attempted rape and sodomy of his four year old daughter. We shall discuss the following two of three assigned errors:

THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY ADMITTING A SOCIAL WORKER’S *707HEARSAY TESTIMONY ABOUT VICTIM’S STATEMENTS AS STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OR TREATMENT.

THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY ADMITTING HEARSAY TESTIMONY BY CHILD’S GRANDFATHER UNDER THE RESIDUAL HEARSAY EXCEPTION WHEN DEFENSE HAD NO MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY TO CROSS-EXAMINE THE CHILD.

We find that the military judge did not err…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Patricia "Patty" CreeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. DelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. LeMereUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. CraytonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. FinkU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. UretaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. OldhamU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API