Legal Opinion
United States v. Ureta
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided November 3, 1994No. ACM 30274PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Judge:
Despite his pleas, a general court-martial composed of members convicted the appellant of one specification of rape and one specification of carnal knowledge in violation of Article 120, UCMJ,1 and one specification of indecent acts with a child in violation of Article 134, UCMJ.2 In each instance, the appellant’s alleged victim was his adolescent daughter, whom we will refer to as “K.” The court sentenced the appellant to a bad-eon-duct discharge, confinement for 10 years, and reduction to the grade of E-l. Appellant makes twelve assignments of error, four…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. UretaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. SirokyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. CabralUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. CoxUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. StreetmanUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.