Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Fink

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 31, 1991No. ACMR 8902495PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GRAVELLE, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, Sergeant Fink was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of three specifications of indecent acts with a child, false swearing, and obstruction of justice, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982). The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a dishonorable discharge and confinement for two years.

Sergeant Fink asserts that the military judge erred by admitting, as exceptions to the hearsay rule, several unsworn,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Morgan v. ForetichCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. GrantU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. UretaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. LyonsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. GreenArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  5. United States v. SpychalaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API