Legal Opinion

Buckbee v. . Board of Education of City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1907PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 10, 1906, which reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the answer and overruling such demurrer in an action to recover a balance alleged to be due for services.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 10, 1906, which reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the answer and overruling such demurrer in an action to recover a balance alleged to be due for services. The following question was certified : “ Is the new matter set up by way of defense in paragraph 2 of the defendant’s answer to each of the causes of action set forth in the complaint a sufficient defense in law upon the . face thereof ? ”

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative on opinion of Clarke, J., helow.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fidler v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. People Ex Rel. Plancon v. . PrendergastNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Woodcock v. DickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Gresser v. O'BrienNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Brown v. Hanford Elementary School BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API