Legal Opinion

Brown v. Hanford Elementary School Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1968No. Civ. 902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying a writ of mandate to compel the board of trustees of Hanford Elementary School District to restore in salary to each of two school teachers the sum of $200 per annum in addition to the pay already provided by contract for the school year 1964-65. These teachers are Billie Bartlow and Mary McNeel Brown (wife of Alex Edward Brown); while they testified at the hearing below in favor of the issuance of the writ, neither of them is a party to the proceedings. The petitioner is not an attorney at law; he justifies his request for a writ…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aebli v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Kacsur v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Fidler v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Chambers v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Buckbee v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Townsend v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. United Teachers of Ukiah v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Eastham v. Santa Clara Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Elam ex rel. Waynesville R-VI School District v. Waynesville R-VI School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Gilbaugh v. BautzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API