Legal Opinion

Gresser v. O'Brien

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

This is an application for a peremptory order of mandamus to compel the respondents to make provision in the revised budget for the year 1933 for ninety per cent of the salary of the petitioner as fixed at the time of his appointment as a justice of the Court of Special Sessions in the City of New York. This he is willing to accept in full for that year, without prejudice to the right thereafter to claim that the attempted reduction of his salary to the sum of $15,040 from $17,500, fixed at the time of bis appointment, was utterly null and void.

The petitioner was appointed a justice of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Evans v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Hepburn v. MannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  4. Musco v. . United Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Long v. WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. MATTER OF MARON v. SilverNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Haggerty v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Maron v. SilverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Poorman v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In re SummersNew York Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API