Legal Opinion
Woodcock v. Dick
California Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1950No. Sac. 6135PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
The sole question raised by this proceeding is whether section 400.2 of the Education Code can be constitutionally applied so as to increase the salary of a county superintendent of schools during his term of office. Section 400.2 provides: ‘ ‘ The salary and qualifications of each county superintendent of schools of each county shall be as set forth in this article. The salaries set forth in this article' are payable to incumbent county superintendents of schools.” The article referred to in this section embraces sections 400 to 459.
Petitioner was elected superintendent of schools of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Fidler v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Busch v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Buckbee v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Carpio v. TUCSON HIGH SCH. DIST. NO 1 OF PIMA CTY.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- McMurry v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Lee CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Graham v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.