Legal Opinion

State v. Massenburg

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 1984No. 8310SC447PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the admission into evidence of the heroin found in the locked glove compartment of his automobile. He first argues, relying on State v. Thompson, 296 N.C. 703, 252 S.E. 2d 776, cert. denied, Thompson v. North Carolina, 444 U.S. 907, 100 S.Ct. 220, 62 L.Ed. 2d 143 (1979), that the officers had no right to approach his automobile. Thompson deals with the right of officers to approach and detain persons suspected of crime. It has no application to the approach of the officers to the defendant’s car in this case. The automobile was in a public parking lot.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. People v. BeltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Hamel v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. State v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. People v. PerezColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API